The Ngram shows that in American English used not to transpired less than fifty percent as usually as did not use(d) to in 2008, and its use has long been steadily declining.
They belong into a different race. Their crudity is that which was in the Roman, as in contrast with the Greek, in real life.
I am American from south Louisiana and for me, "to get used of" indicates "for being used to." It used to bother my ex when I claimed, "I'm used of troublesome men and women.
Jon HannaJon Hanna fifty three.9k22 gold badges119119 silver badges193193 bronze badges one I believe the usages from the preposition "of" in "What is alleged of some thing?" and "What do you're thinking that of something?" are similar to that in "Some term is used of one thing".
the house or lodge is more appropriate in other contexts but I"m not going to look at those exhaustively today.
3 It seems odd to me that "used she to come back listed here?" is marked as official (old-fashioned and awkward I agree with). The "used to" construction registers with me as remaining fundamentally casual. In a proper context I might hope "did she previously arrive below?" or some other wordier phrase. (AmE speaker)
Stack Exchange network is made of 183 Q&A communities such as Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to master, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Take a look at Stack Exchange
is at least twice as "unpopular" while in the US (often a good indicator of where global usage is headed).
if I would been at other locations that working day and envisioned only being there for a while (especially if another person knew this). Similarly, I might say
In click here English "or" is normally taken to get exclusive or, if you wish to specially use inclusive or then use "and/or".
"I am in China. I am on the Great Wall. Tomorrow I will be to the island." I'm not conscious of Anybody uncomplicated rule that will often lead you towards the "proper" preposition (While Gulliver's guideline under is usually a good generality), and sometimes they may be used interchangeably.
It really is more than regular looking to me, since like many listed here I am usually looking into what terms where used for
will be the relative pronoun used for non-animate antecedents. If we extend the shortest with the OP's example sentences to replace the pronoun that
Both of those the phrases imply that an action has actually been performed continuously; they aren't used to confer with actions that happened only once.